I think it's a difference in sorting between pure-RAM tables and disk-based databases (triggered if the number of files exceeds about 175,000 or if the program detects available RAM is low). IIRC, the disk-based SQL database contains action code-values (not the text you see) and is sorted thereon. You may thus find other cosmetic anomalies such as the fact that when a disk d/b is used, and when sorted in Ascending order, Skip appears above Copy To Right/ Destination, because the Skip code (1) is lowest numerically. So for Actions, ascending/descending is not really applicable; as long as the column is 'sorted upon' and the same Actions are grouped together, we're not really concerned with the different order.
↧